Is Google the “Microsoft” of the Internet?

Guest Blogger,


Google, a common brand and verb among technology and non-technology enthusiasts, is growing at an enormous rate! People can recognize this growth because of its many acquisitions of companies (ten so far this year), such as the seven major Web 2.0 products/services mentioned below (in the order of acquisition date) which consumes a good part of the internet pie:

Blogger.com: This was one of the most popular blogging networks, which was acquired by Google in February 2003. It has a huge database of users, that does not only include personal blogs but also blogs from very big sites and companies.

Picasa: Along with this great image cataloging software application, the user also got to use 1GB of space to upload and share their images on the internet and publish them on blogs.

Keyhole, Inc. and Where 2: Both these companies created good mapping software, which Google then used to develop the Google Earth software and Google Maps online. It was further enhanced by publishing the API so that other applications such as Google Ride Finder or at least 50 other things can be created.

Dodgeball: A social network application for mobile devices, which was bought by Google in May 2005. It allowed people to text their locations into the service so that their friends can find them more easily in the area.

2Web Technologies / Upstartle: The latter company created a product called “Writely”, which could be used for online word processing and the other company developed software that helped Google create its web-based spreadsheet. Both these products were acquired as it allowed Google members to collaborate and share their documents with people online with ease, and also at the same time, compete with Microsoft’s flagship product Microsoft Office.

YouTube: By buying this at a value of $1.65 billion in Google stock, Google made a huge mark on the internet. This popular video sharing site is visited by millions of users each day, plus the millions of others who view YouTube’s syndicated content across personal sites and video search engines like uLinkx.

Panoramio: This location aware photo sharing site uses the Google Maps API to also allow people to take photographs of the locations and plot it on the map.

FeedBurner: About half a million publishers use this tool as it is one of the best ways to track and manage RSS feeds. These feeds are then read by millions more who subscribe.

The best part of it all is that the basic features of these products/services are free and are more than enough to attract the average user. People love this simple fact and thus, it also enhances the user’s impression towards Google, allowing it to continue to grow it's member base.

But, why is Google going through so many quick acquisitions? Is it that because they are sitting on a pile of cash that they don’t want to turn into an “Investment fund status” (so much so that rumours circulated that Google was planning to purchase Facebook too - another major web 2.0 service to join in with Orkut, which they already own - for $2.1 billion in stock), or is it because they want to dominate web real estate properties so, like Microsoft who dominate the software on the PC market, they can control a major portion of the internet, and then profit of it later BIG TIME?

Which brings me to ask you: Do you think Google will stick to it's "Do no evil" philosophy down the road or will it too, simply, be like Microsoft?

This post was written for Profy iPhone competition by Mark D'Souza, recent graduate with a Bachelor of Applied technology degree in Software development. He loves technology and tries to be an adopter of it (if it's not too expensive). Enter the competition to get your iPhone for free and adapt this latest technology absolutely for free!


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
17 Comments (Subscribe to rss)
  • Very informative story. It seems like only yesterday that Google was a startup company, and now they're buying up other companies left and right.

  • True however I hardly thing that Microsoft can be taken as an example, at least not now that we’re in web 2.0.

    Web 2.0 is decentralized and will always be so.

  • Interesting piece - hasn’t google already “caved” to China though allowing censorship of its results?

  • It’s amazing what Google is doing to take over the web. Buying Youtube and other companies. Eventually they’ll buy out other search engines (yahoo ect)…None the less Google rocks.

  • I agree the google is the king of internet

  • I agree google is taking over the web. However they are doing a good job of it :)

  • ^ I agree. What she said.

  • Interesting Article… Hopefully they stick with their “Do no evil” philosophy:)
    Thanks for all the Info Mark!

  • I could agree with the question. I am in the computing industry and when a company like M$ or Google to now share most of their stats publicly, they have something to hind. Both of these companies like to be very secretive of what they are developing and never share code to the public, like so many Linux OS do.

  • great article, invoked some interesting thoughts and questions. I do like my igoogle though!

  • Very interesting, i think and hope they will stick with their “Do no Evil” philosophy. Google as far as i seen is a real good company.

  • There was a lot in the article that I didn’t know. I hope Google lives true to its word and continues to reign.

  • Just found out alot of things in this article, very informative! Thanks..

  • Wow, I would’ve never thought of Google as being like Microsoft… a very thought-provoking article!

  • I would like to believe that Google will stick to their “do no evil” philosophy, but I really don’t know. I’ll all boil down to what the share holders want (and people bought shares to make a profit), so it looks like they will turn into another Microsoft after all.

    All the same, a lot of the sites Google owns sound quite interesting - I didn’t know about half of them, so now I’ll have to go do a little surfing :)

    Thanks for putting this up - it was very informative.

  • So, if i understand the artical, i’ts suggesting i should boycott google? Maybe. If only i can find anohter search engine that will give me a ‘cached’ version of a web site,showing it to me the way it used to be…. sigh.

  • I think this is completely arbitrary. While microsoft is a software designer and was a pioneer, google was and is a mere search engine. The sky was the limit for microsoft, but comparing them to google is like apples and oranges.

Leave a comment (We support avatars from Gravatar, MyBlogLog, and FriendFeed)