NIN’s Trent Reznor Claims To Have Account At Torrent Site OiNK
10/31/2007, 10 months ago
By now you’ve probably gotten a bit familiar already with OiNK, a peer-to-peer venue that recently had itself publicly manhandled and forced offline by both Dutch and English authorities last week. And you’ve likely received word that The Pirate Bay promised to “re-launch” the operation, albeit with a ‘B’ added to its title (so “BOiNK” will be its new name; cheeky, eh?).
Well, today you’re going to get another little factoid to add to your daily dose of nifty news to do with the torrent-centric online outlet. It turns out that OiNK, a popular yet widely unknown linktastic Web-based institution, has itself a fan of the musical world widely known.
Uh huh, that’s correct. Mr Trent Reznor, of Nine Inch Nails fame, a man idolized as much for his soundtrack as his persistent anti-Big-Media rhetoric, divulged recently in an interview with New York Magazine (co-interview, actually, alongside Saul Williams, the poet/hip-hop artist) that he had in fact registered an account with the website and “frequented it quite often.”
The reason for his regular visitations to the place (before it got canned, of course), according to the transcript of the interview, is that “at the end of the day…it was like the world’s greatest record store.
Pretty much anything you could ever imagine, it was there, and it was there in the format you wanted.” Reznor added, “If OiNK cost anything, I would certainly have paid….”
There you have it, folks. Chalk another one up for service, convenience, and demand for a quality product – and the absence of most all of those things in the current market of legal options - as a primary reason for the proliferation of copyrighted content on the Web. And, subsequently, for the industry’s ills.
Talking seriously here for a moment, though, there’s a lot of truth to what Reznor has said, and what many aficionados of the peer-to-peer world have claimed for many years now. It is, in short, that the consumer wants what he/she wants.
And because advances in digital technologies have enabled more and more people to enjoy things at greater leisure and convenience, they’re naturally widely adopted. The conflict between record industry and consumer is borne of the fact that the companies controlling the majority of the market allowed themselves to be subverted by the list of new technologies that have risen in the last decade or so, rather than “bit the bullet” in embracing them and working with them (to their advantage.)
Instead, however, Big Media grew very fearful of things they didn’t quite understand (a reaction quite natural in many facets of live, really), and tried to stomp them out any which way they could. Of course, those “things” have been like ants, replicating like mad, and practically impossible to eradicate entirely, so they’ve proliferated. Exponentially so.
Now the music industry is growing tired, having lifted and dropped its boot on consumers one too many times (no to avail), a though it seems to have enough energy to maintain regular attacks on entities like OiNK and so forth for a short while longer, there’s absolutely no way it can possibly continue on its current track and maintain its status as “Big Media.”
For the record (no pun intended), I’m personally grateful for what Trent Reznor and others like him are doing. It’s quite important, no doubt, considering all that’s been chronicled during the digital age thus far. Having some well-placed and intelligent people backing the pro-consumer movement “behind enemy lines” is extremely necessary. I’m sure many (and perhaps even all) of you feel the same.
So here’s to getting our way, eventually. Even if it is obtained the hard way.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!





Does that toast also apply to that guy in the ski mask who wants your car without paying for it?
The problem with “your way” is that an economy built according to it would collapse overnight. I’m sure you sincerely believe that you’re more deserving of a free ride than others, but so far I haven’t seen you produce any convincing arguments as to why that should be so….
Ian,
The BitTorrent delivery system in and of itself isn’t the evil. It’s used to perpetrate illicit transfers of media and other digital data, but the “messenger” isn’t to blame.
Sure, there’s some very gray area in which music and movies are shared on the Web, but that doesn’t mean entities like the Big Four cannot prescribe to such systems as BitTorrent to market their material. If they did so, and did so intelligently (via an independent, neutral, Amazon-esque portal, so as to ensure that the consumer’s interest is adhered to; not their very own), I think they could turn things around a bit in their favor.
The problem with most current arrangements Big Media have orchestrated thus far is that they want to give consumers what THEY want, not give consumers what CONSUMERS want. The latter scenario is how it ought to go, yes?
And now that consumers have an (easy) method with which to tell them to “shove off”, the whole issue of piracy has grown into a massive conflagration. But that conflagration is really just consumers’ signaling to the studios that they know what they want, they want what they want, how they want it, and they’ll get it in such a way, whether it’s legal or not. Not to do something illegal. Not to break the law. But to signify a particular demand.
So what’s the idea? You can’t let your friends listen to music, watch a movie, or look at some pictures without buying a license from some f’n corporation??
What a f’n POLICE STATE, if artists cannot live off of appreciation then they seek some non-human entity to “sell” off their ideas, well great, but don’t cry if the public turns its back on this bs, most of the profits go to the non-human corporation, these are the middle-men - who ARE the pirates here??
We’ll see what the tides of time leave behind, humans or non-human corporations, after all ALL ideas are the blessing of something higher than one’s egocentric limited mind, “your” idea is not yours, you are just one of the MANY possible streams of consciousnesses that may bring a present-existing idea into and out of your own subjective world, you can’t own that, and we’ll certainly not want to be forced to pay for that, not with out some sort of aggressive forceful action which you’ll pay in HELL for now or later.
People work because they want to, they sing or play or write because they want to, it’s all our time together to share, why fight? Why use force? Why resolve your feelings of GREED by hurting others?? I’m sure all slaves harbor resentment and long for a peaceful living, we are slaves to all this non-human corporation bs, and some have been assigned the task of beating on the workers for fear they’ll be just like the workers themselves! Slave owners love the control they feel over all this!
The profit it gives them using their non-human corporations! Power corrupts lower minds in a powerful way, but leaves a long wake of pain and hurt to echo until freedom and liberation change things for the better… for the better of all… Thanks and so long!