TorrentSpy Judged To Have Tampered With Evidence During Court Case

TorrentSpy, once a stalwart participant of BitTorrent communications on the Web, found today that its future was no more. News widely emerged this morning of the website’s defeat amidst the powers of the MPAA in court. The judge presiding over the case involving the link farm “made a default ruling in favor of the MPAA…(saying) the site’s operators had tampered with evidence.”

Long a popular post for links to peer-to-peer file transfers, TorrentSpy first hit a rough patch when news of its being targeted by the MPAA reached the public’s ear. Soon thereafter, activity at the site slowed considerably. Later, the website was rumored to be passing user information to authorities, which its administrators made repeat attempts to rebuff, mostly to no avail. Now it has a high-profile judicial loss to assess.

Clearly, the prognosis for further life for TorrentSpy is not a good one. Unlikely to gain prominence in the realm of digital file sharing, regardless of whether it opts to house a directory of links pertaining to exclusively free and legal data, we see a short and grim end for the controversial outfit when all deliberations are through, even taking into account the appeal it is expected to file.

Why go so far as a to spell doom? Simple. Obstruction of justice by way of evidence manipulation. No matter what the nature of any changes made regarding the data collected (either temporarily or permanently), the result of such a charge against the defendant (TorrentSpy) is an almost immediate ruling in favor of the plaintiff (MPAA). Furthermore, very few exceptions have ever historically been made to reverse such default decisions. In effect, the cards are stacked very much against TorrentSpy at present.

When all the dust settles, the only eventual outcome we can foresee as a possibility for TorrentSpy is a sort of reinvention, but whether its proprietors see any incentive to do so is now too difficult to infer. (Keep in mind, the abovementioned case has not yet concluded. The aspect of damages must still be ruled upon.)

Check back with Profy for more information on the matter as new developments surface.