Take the Red Pill: We Have No True Web 2.0

Cyndy Aleo-Carreira,


Matrix image of red and blue pillsThe other night, my husband asked me a question I had no answer for: when we've moved on to whatever Web 3.0 is going to be, what will be left of Web 2.0? There are carryovers from the 1.0 Bubble, but when you think about it, the Web itself is 1.0. And Tim Berners-Lee himself has argued that we can't delineate Web 2.0 since so much of the technology has existed since the beginning of the Web.

Everyone has tried to pin down what Web 2.0 is, with little success. Social networking? We had IRC and BBSs before half of the Web 2.0 users were probably even born. Web 1.0 brought us online chat and forums and social networking sites focused on specific topic areas and bringing users together. The seeds of Software as a Service were laid with web-based email from Yahoo and Hotmail, and Instant Messenger services were right alongside it.

So what else can be argued? The democratization of the Web? With all the user-generated content out there, and all the blogs (which pre-date Web 2.0 as well), we may be free to choose our own content to read, but there is so much of it, we follow like sheep to whatever we are told to use. We choose what services to use, what blogs to read, what sites to visit, and what apps to install based on a perceived wisdom of the crowd, but the crowd is taking its lead from the A-listers and early adopters.

This morning I was talking to Ben Golub of RSSmeme and Aaron Newman of Techrigy at the Rochester Open Coffee Club about FriendFeed, and both were amused when I repeated (probably almost obsessively) that I detest FriendFeed. I may have even used the word hate. I use it because it's a necessary evil in this job, but I don't think I'll ever like it, even if Duncan Riley did go over to the Dark Side. There is no more democracy there than there is anywhere else; it's the new Techmeme. An informal survey on FriendFeed had predictable results. Techmeme is ruled by TechCrunch; FriendFeed is ruled by Robert Scoble and Louis Gray. And sure enough, in the number of apps that have gained popularity recently, FriendFeed is one that both Robert Scoble and Louis Gray have hyped a great deal. So many people in the early adopter crowd are dependent on keeping up with not only what's popular, but also what's being discussed on those popular sites, and as a result, are dragged, possibly kicking and screaming, and regardless of whether they feel it's really worth the time and energy.

So while tech has developed, it hasn't really changed. While more people are trying to add their voices, it's still an aristocracy that decides what voices are heard and what developments are recognized. The rulers may change, but for the most part, Web 2.0 has had no revolution. I'd like to change that a little bit; take the red pill with me, and leave me a comment listing one blog I'm not aware of, one app I've never seen, one person whose name I've never heard that's missing out on some deserved recognition in the web space.


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
5 Comments (Subscribe to rss)
  • It could be that web 2.0’s biggest contribution was user generated content which had its peak with you tube and blogs. Other than that - all the social networking stuff could very well prove to just be “features” that can be added to any site - which is what Google and Yahoo! are starting to do. Not a huge revolution, just more interactivity online - which is a good thing, but not the money making stand alone business models that people hope for.

  • No GravatarCyndy Aleo-Carreira - May 16, 2008 at 10:40 pm PDT

    First, you cheated and didn’t give me someone or something new. ;)

    Second, I’m not entirely sure that the whole YouTube thing will last. Google hasn’t figured out how to monetize it, and while they can support a whole raft of money- and bandwidth-sucks on their revenue stream, eventually they will streamline. I for one could live the rest of my life without another crazed Britney fan posting UGC. And you nailed it. Most of everything is just feature build-out. So not Web 2.0, but more like Web 1.0.0.1.

  • HI Cyndy,
    very nice post.
    I have to say that Web 1.0.0.1 is real a funny one (but a bit boring topic too)…
    On the other side the “aristocracy” concept is quite revealing.
    Sometimes this evangelism is even not so “clean” as I would like it to be!
    But, as per the long tail law, I think there is already a service infrastructure in place to StubleUpon new voices and developments…
    I’ve discovered you through FriendFeed btw!
    Something has changed…

  • No GravatarCyndy Aleo-Carreira - May 17, 2008 at 04:49 pm PDT

    Thanks Luigi; sorry if it was boring. ;)

    I think that the aristocracy comparison is a valid one, and probably one that won’t get very much acknowledgment. I am glad you found me on FriendFeed, though, as it makes my very reluctant participation there feel worthwhile.

  • Willitfly.com uses unique technology (the Will-it-Fly?® DKTS) that makes it easier to understand and follow any type of codified procedure (best practices, standard operating procedure, etc.) at the time of need, which is why PC World dubbed the site “Cliff’s notes for business tasks.” Check it out, it’s different.

Leave a comment (We support avatars from Gravatar, MyBlogLog, and FriendFeed)